So, when I first began to listen to the powwow native radio
stream I was taken aback because I connected right in the middle of a comedy
routine that went some like this… If you’ve ever used your probation officer as
a reference, you might be a redskin. If you have no screen on your screen door,
you might be a redskin. If your pocket knife has ever been shown as exhibit
one, you might be a redskin. Etc… I guess I was taken about because of the
initial racist implications. For instance, if it were a “white” comedian saying
that it would most likely be viewed in a negative light. It would be considered
racist. But, as I’ve said before, I remember learning that comedy is a big part
of contemporary native American culture, and they often poke fun at themselves.
Only after thinking about this was I able to relax, haha.
I’m not sure what that’s about, but I guess it has to do
with how touchy a subject racism seems to be at this point. Maybe not with everyone;
I can’t go that far, but it does seem to be moving in the general direction of unacceptability.
I feel this very strongly. I refuse to honor any racist ideology, regardless of
where it comes from or who it is directed at. I agree whole heartedly with
Vizenor when he says, “Sadly, the notion of four colors perpetuates a crude
separation of humans and cultures rather than begetting a sense of peace” (Preface
xiii). I also agree with his statement: “Race is a simulation, and the ‘science’
of race is political not biological; human differences are genetic, but the
notions of four races are dubious traditions and faux science” (Preface xiv). This
has always been my argument. The very idea of different races is racist and does
nothing for unity and peace. So why give it power by upholding race as a
defining factor in our various ways of interacting with those who share the
world with us? For despite the fact that there are biological differences such
as skin tone, hair type, facial structure, etc… race as a separating hierarchical
system is a socially created concept
that has been taken far too seriously for far too long. Even as I write this I
hear the words, “until the color of a man’s skin is of no more significance
then the color of his eyes, me say war.”
However, I do realize that because the concept of race has
been taken so seriously for so long, it is so powerful now that it seems almost
impossible to rid ourselves of its polluting influence. Although, if there is a
method of purging it from our world, I believe that it can be found in the work
of people like Charles Alexander Eastman. Vizenor recounts how “Eastman spent
the balance of his long life making his way along the narrow path that bridged
his two cultures” by building “bridges of understanding” (51). Through bridging
the gap between our minor differences, and even some of our greater ones, in
terms of culture, language, spirituality, etc… we may generate understanding among ourselves.
But, I also recognize that for some of us this is not so
simple, because where I do not have to deal with racism on a daily basis,
others have to deal with it on a level that far exceeds any understanding I
could pretend to have. For example, because of what I am and how I look, I fit
into the racist patriarchy of the system we currently live in, being that I am
male and happen to look what is considered “white.” Due to this ridiculousness,
I am not discriminated against. If my physical attributes were not male and I
was not considered to be “white,” I would certainly experience a higher degree
of discrimination in this world. I recognize this fact, for discrimination
lives off of sexism, racism, nationality, religion, etc…
This is why I initially had trouble reading the article by
Vine Deloria, Jr. His repetitive use of terms like whites and blacks bothered
me. I hate it when people are referred to in this way. It sounds racist when anyone
says it, regardless of their so called “race.” It would be like me refereeing to
the Native Americans as the reds. To reduce a person or people to an arbitrary
color that has nothing to do with anything in reality is ridiculous. But again,
I know that it was Europeans that originally created these terms, including “white.”
But I still struggle with these terms. Something within me is disgusted by
them. And yet, I even use them at times myself.
Then I think of what happened to the Native peoples of this
land at the hands of the Europeans and I find it hard to care that they would
speak of Europeans as whites. Once again, I must admit that I know nothing of
their struggle. I am not Native American. I have no idea what that’s like. I
might think I do. But I don’t. I can sympathize when I read what it’s like from
their own writings, but that’s about it. Vine Deloria says that “To be an
Indian in modern American society is in a very real sense to be unreal and
ahistorical” (2). I do not know what that’s like.
However, I still think that it is important that we at least
try to understand one another, even if such a thing would be a long and painful
process. I think that the work of people like Eastman is invaluable in this
quest for understanding. For example, Vizenor writes of how Eastman reveals
that “The Indian no more worshiped the Sun than the Christian adores the Cross”
(50). With this short excerpt, Eastman works to undo the misperceptions that
are born of ignorance, and thus foster understanding among both his cultural
heritages. He also recounts the beautiful lines that follow, as further
explanation:
The Sun and the Earth, by an obvious parable, holding scarcely
more of poetic metaphor than of scientific truth, were in his view the parents
of all organic life. From the Sun, as the universal father, proceeds the
quickening principle in nature, and in the patient and fruitful womb of our
mother, the Earth, are hidden embryos of plants and men. (50)
Here is an example of a person who makes great use of his
cultural hybridity in bridging the gap between two cultures by using aspects of both to encourage
understanding.
This argument comes up over and over again--is it racist when it comes from the people who are considered the intended victims in the first place? Personally I don't have an answer I thought I did! My friend jenny and I had this convo last semester. I said I found it insulting when gay guys call themselves faggots, it's a word used to oppress. But she pointed out that some people find it empowering to use the words that put them down in the first place. I don't have the answer but I like how you point out that natives use humor about their own lives for empowerment. Why must we all be so serious? Maybe we should laugh at the meaning we give words!
ReplyDelete